The concept of “degeneration” is associated with the fin-de-siècle period and came to Russian soil from Western Europe. First and foremost, it was represented there by Cesare Lombroso and his popularizer, the author of the book Degeneration, Max Nordau. The concept of degeneracy was studied by the scientist using the work of outstanding representatives of European art, including Leo Tolstoy. The book was a scandalous success in Russia and a subject
of numerous magazine reviews. Chekhov implicitly participated in this polemic. The writer’s cryptic review of the fashionable problem of degeneracy can be seen in the image of Dr. Dorn, which allows to examine the elements of Chekhov’s cryptopoetics. The surname of this character in The Seagull is considered as a transformation of the surname Nordau. An analysis of Dorn’s behavior and speech suggests that the author of the play uses it to express his position regarding the “nervous age” and the fatigue and degeneration associated with it. The intertextually expressed polemic between Chekhov and Nordau allows to define the role of Dorn as a hidden trickster. This is an additional argument that proves the validity of the author’s definition of The Seagull as a comedy.
1. Bocharov S. G. About a Possible Plot: “Eugene Onegin”. In: Bocharov S. G. Syuzhety russkoy literatury [Bocharov S. G. Subjects of Russian Literature]. Moscow, Yazyki russkoy kul’tury Publ., 1999. pp. 17–77. (In Russ.)
2. Zakharov V. N. The Poetics of Madness in Pushkin, Gogol, Dostoevsky (Polemic Notes). In: Problemy istoricheskoy poetiki [The Problems of Historical Poetics], 2021, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 92–106. Available at: https://poetica.pro/
files/redaktor_pdf/1621013677.pdf (accessed on May 15, 2021). DOI: 10.15393/ j9.art.2021.9642 (In Russ.)
3. Kibal’nik S. A. Chekhov’s “The Grasshopper” as a Cryptographic Parody of “Madame Bovary”. In: Izvestiya rossiyskoy akademii nauk. Seriya literatury i yazyka [Bulletin of the Russian Academy of Sciences. Studies in Language and Literature], 2012, vol. 71, no. 2, pp. 52–57. (In Russ.)
4. Kreycha O. “Pay attention…” (Fragments of the Book). In: Chekhoviana. Melikhovskie trudy i dni [Chekhoviana. Works and Days in Melikhovo]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1995, pp. 133–153. (In Russ.)
5. Larin S. A. Kriptopoetika russkoy literatury [Cryptopoetics of Russian Literature]. Voronezh, Voronezh State University Publ., 2019. 110 p. (In Russ.)
6. Nikolozi R. Vyrozhdenie: literatura i psikhiatriya v russkoy kul’ture kontsa XIX veka [Degeneration: Literature and Psychiatry in Russian Culture of the Late 19th Century]. Moscow, Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie Publ., 2019. 509 p. (In Russ.)
7. Rayfield D. Zhizn’ Antona Chekhova [The Life of Anton Chekhov]. Moscow, KoLibri Publ., Azbuka-Attikus Publ., 2014. 896 p. (In Russ.)
8. Odesskaya M. M. Ibsen, Strindberg, Chekhov in the Max Nordau’s Concept of Degeneracy. In: Ibsen, Strindberg, Chekhov. Moscow, Russian State University for the Humanities Publ., 2007, pp. 211–226. (In Russ.)
9. Greenslade W. Degeneration, Culture and the Novel: 1880–1940. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press Publ., 1994. 372 р. (In English)