Hospital Scenes in Dostoevsky’s “Notes from a Dead House”

Abstract

Dostoevsky conceived “Notes from a Dead House” as a memoir, but the concept was transformed, leading to a change in the chronology and circumstances of the author’s biography. The writer not only described, but also composed his life, placed it in the context of world history. Hospital scenes are important in the structure of “Notes.” Dostoevsky gave an almost professional description of physical illnesses and their treatment. He passes competent judgement on hospital medicine, is fluent in the medical thesaurus, and uses medical Latin. His descriptions are accompanied by judgments and stories about crimes and corporal punishment of prisoners, about executioners and executioners. He believes that medicine in Russia is hostile and does not correspond to the spirit of the people, their habits. The author’s descriptions are factual. They recreate an empirical reality that receives metaphysical interpretation. The means of transforming the empirical into the sacred is Dante’s “Divine Comedy,” which influenced the concept of hell, the poetics and structure of Dostoevsky’s “Notes from a Dead House.” Dante saw hell, purgatory, paradise; his visions became the subject of poetry. Dostoevsky lived in hell, in a “Dead House,” this is his personal experience. There are two narrators in the “Notes”: the author’s alter ego and the fictional Alexander Petrovich Goryanchikov,
a kind of literary mask of the author. They have different roles, which are often difficult to distinguish. The hero’s name and patronymic are most often heard in conversations with other characters: he asks questions, and they tell him about themselves. It is not the author who asks tactless questions to the heroes — Alexander Petrovich, a knowledgeable prisoner of the “Dead House,” does it for him. He is Dostoevsky’s Virgil. Alexander Petrovich has no future, his hellish toils without purgatory and paradise continued in the “hellish life on the outside.” Not purgatory, but Easter is the act of transformation of the author,
who has risen from the dead, found freedom, a new life and a future.

References

1. Akel’kina E. A. Dante and Dostoevsky (Reception of Dante’s Experience of the Organization of the Narration in the “Divine Comedy” in the Creation of “The House of the Dead”). In: Vestnik Omskogo universiteta [Herald of Omsk University], 2012, no. 2, pp. 394–399. (In Russ.)
2. Viktorovich V. A., Zakharova O. V. F. M. Dostoevskiy v russkoy kritike. 1845–1881 [F. M. Dostoevsky in Russian Criticism. 1845–1881]. Kolomna, Izdatel’skiy Dom Liga Publ., 2021. 536 p. (In Russ.)
3. Volkova E. I. Russian Dante (Hell and Paradise in the Art World of F. M. Dostoevsky. In: Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 19: Lingvistika i mezhkul’turnaya kommunikatsiya [Moscow State University Bulletin. Series 19: Linguistics and Intercultural Communication], 2002, no. 2, pp. 40–46. (In Russ.)
4. Dudkin V. V. The Inexpressible in the Works of Dante, Goethe and Dostoevsky. In: Problemy istoricheskoy poetiki [The Problems of Historical Poetics]. Petrozavodsk, Petrozavodsk State University Publ., 2012, issue 10, pp. 86–113. Available at: https://poetica.pro/files/redaktor_pdf/1457953703.pdf (accessed on February 5, 2022). DOI: 10.15393/j9.art.2012.343 (In Russ.)
5. Evangelie Dostoevskogo: v 3 tomakh [The Gospel of Dostoevsky: in 3 Vols]. Tobolsk, Obshchestvennyy blagotvoritel’nyy fond “Vozrozhdenie Tobol’ska” Publ., 2017, vol. 2: Research. Materials for the Commentary. 1084 p. (In Russ.)
6. Esaulov I. A. Paskhal’nost’ russkoy slovesnosti [Paskhal’nost’ of Russian Literature]. Magadan, Novoe Vremya Publ., 2020. 480 p. (In Russ.)
7. Zakharov V. N. About Dostoevsky’s Stories. In: Dostoevskiy F. M. Rasskazy [Dostoevsky F. M. Stories]. Petrozavodsk, Kareliya Publ., 1985, pp. 431–446. (In Russ.) (a)
8. Zakharov V. N. Sistema zhanrov Dostoevskogo: tipologiya i poetika [The System of Genres of Dostoevsky: Typology and Poetics]. Leningrad, Leningrad State University Publ., 1985. 208 p. (b)
9. Zakharov V. N. Wonderful Storyteller. In: Dostoevskiy F. M. Rasskazy [Dostoevsky F. M. Stories]. Moscow, Pravda Publ., 1989, pp. 3–14. (In Russ.)
10. Zakharov V. N. Christian Realism in Russian Literature (Problem Statement). In: Problemy istoricheskoy poetiki [The Problems of Historical Poetics]. Petrozavodsk, Petrozavodsk State University Publ., 2001, issue 6, pp. 5–20. Available at: https://poetica.pro/journal/article.php?id=2511 (accessed on February 5, 2022). DOI: 10.15393/j9.art.2001.2511 (In Russ.)
11. Kasatkina T. A. Svyashchennoe v povsednevnom: dvusostavnyy obraz v proizvedeniyakh F. M. Dostoevskogo [The Sacred in Everyday Life: A TwoPart Image in Dostoevsky’s Works]. Moscow, The Gorky Institute of World Literature of the Russian Academy of Sciences Publ., 2015. 528 p. (In Russ.)
12. Lyubimskaya O. M. The Motif of Paradise in the Works of F. M. Dostoevsky in the 1860s — 1870s. In: Ural’skiy filologicheskiy vestnik. Seriya: Draft: molodaya naukа [Ural Journal of Philology. Series: Draft: Young Science],
2015, no. 5, pp. 92–10. (In Russ.)
13. Pigin A. V. On Some Features of the Poetics of the Story of the Natural School. In: Zhanr i kompozitsiya literaturnogo proizvedeniya [Genre and Composition of a Literary Work]. Petrozavodsk, 1988, pp. 45–52. (In Russ.)
14. Toichkina A. V. The Image of Hell in the “Notes from the House of the Dead”. On the Topic Dostoevsky and Dante. In: Dostoevskiy i mirovaya kul’tura: al’manakh [Dostoevsky and World Culture: Almanac], 2012, no. 29, pp. 52–66. (In Russ.)
15. Toichkina A. V. The Poetics of the Symbol in Dante’s “Divine Comedy” and Dostoevsky’s “Notes from the House of the Dead”. In: Dostoevskiy i mirovaya kul’tura: al’manakh [Dostoevsky and World Culture: Almanac], 2013, no. 30 (1),
pp. 83–108. (In Russ.)
16. Shklovskiy V. B. Za i protiv. Zametki o Dostoevskom [Pro et Contra. Notes About Dostoevsky]. Мoscow, Sovetskiy pisatel’ Publ., 1957. 259 p. (In Russ.)
 

Year
2022
Number
20(2)
Pages
304-323
DOI
10.15393/j9.art.2022.11083